Skip to main content

The Physics of Spirituality


There exists an open secret in the heart of Physics, that stands to challenge all sciences of matter. It appears in the form of two theories within quantum physics, that profoundly reorient truths previously held, and shed light on the nature of reality as a whole. These theories have shaken up our understanding of the world and universe in the 20th century. Yet, oddly enough, the news of their implications seems not to have trickled down to the other disciplines as one would have expected. Nonetheless, their congruence with some of the axioms of spiritual doctrines is not to be ignored.

Having abandoned the formal pursuit of the sciences at a young age, there are limitations in my grasp of these Quantum Mechanical theories. Yet, I present here approximations of my understanding, reached through casual self-education, and highlight my perception of their implications. As I understand it, the behaviour of subatomic particles, at the quantum mechanical level, demonstrate many peculiarities that are unaccountable for by the models of mechanistic physics. Two major theories that embody this fact are Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle and Bell's Non-Locality Theorem.

Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle:
Theory: This principle essentially demonstrates the limitation that exist in knowing the true nature of any particle, by measurements conducted by any experimental observer. More specifically, the Uncertainty Principle says that one can never know the exact location and the velocity of a particle at the same instant. When you get more accurate information of one, it comes at the expense of the accuracy of the other. The theory shows that the very act of observation, which involves bombarding the particle with photons (by shining light), will inevitably effect the observation, thus compromising the accuracy of the measurement.

Implications: What this implies is that there inherently exists uncertainty in all observations of reality. If carried forth to its most conservative conclusion, what it seems to indicate is that the solidity of the material reality that we observe, and take as truth, is thrown into serious doubt. The question arises, does this reality exist at all the way we observe it? Is there any objective reality?

Bell's Non-locality Theorem:
Theory: The theory was essentially responsible to draw a distinct line between mechanistic physics and quantum mechanics. It is often reduced to the following statement: No physical theory of local hidden variables can ever reproduce all of the predictions of quantum mechanics. In simple terms, the theory is saying that there are certain variables associated with mechanistic physics that are localized variables - meaning that they exist in the physical locality of the subject being observed. Meanwhile, these localized variables seem to be insufficient to explain the behavior of particles in quantum mechanics, which necessarily require non-localized variables for their explanation. Non-localized variables indicate variables that can act across great distances, even faster than the speed of light, or more accurately - instantaneously. Furthermore, the theory demonstrates that there seems to exist an exchange of information between non-local systems, causing their behaviour to be related to each other.

Implications: What this implies is that any two particles that have ever been associated with each other in any local system, would continue to be connected to each other despite the distance and time between them. This means, that a change in one particle will cause a resultant change in the other particle, at the same instant. In the broadest sense, since all particles in the universe were in the same localized system during the Big Bang, this implies that all particles in the universe are connected with each other, instantaneously, across infinite distances.

In the vernacular of spirituality, these theorem are speaking directly to two axioms that exist in spiritual traditions around the world:

Firstly, is the assertion that reality is in fact an illusion. Hindu and Buddhist spiritual traditions articulate this with the term Maya or Illusion. The idea is also present in Sufi spiritual traditions. It states that the world is an illusion that we can only perceive through veils of interpretation, and that in the act of seeing the world, we are only able to see the veil itself. While the true nature of reality always eludes us. As one can see, this idea is speaking quite directly to the Uncertainty Principle - our observations of reality are inherently uncertain, inaccurate, and therefore, an illusion.

Secondly, is the idea in spiritual traditions of the 'oneness of all things', also articulated as the connectedness of all beings in the universe. This implied connected nature of all existence in the Universe, persists despite time or distance. In actuality, this concept is also directly resonating Bell's Non-Locality Theorem - that all things in the universe are connected to each other and are, in reality, as one.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Know Thyself: An attempt at deconstruction

Long before the Oracle pointed Neo to the words above her doorway, numerous teachers, sages and mystics have uttered different versions of the same maxim - "Know Thyself". Although historians credit the Greek philosopher Heraclitus (~ 500BC) with the first written record of the saying, there are various articulations of the same aphorism which date back even further. For example, in shamanic wisdom traditions, some of which find their roots 5000-6000 years ago, there is great emphasis on acquiring deep self-knowledge before assuming the role of a shaman. Similarly, Buddhist teachings dating back to around 2500 BC centre around meditative practices that equip one to delve into one's inner universe. Closer to present day, the Hadith quotes Prophet Muhammad saying "whosoever knows himself knows his lord", highlighting the importance of self-knowledge for communion with the divine. Meanwhile, in the bible, when Jesus Christ asks his followers to "know the kingd...

Linked But Not Tainted

F: I could accuse you of the same fault Terence, of sweeping generalizations and knee jerk aversions. T: As is your prerogative of course. But do tell more. F: Your constant tirade against modern science and rationalism , bears within it many contradictions you know. It seems like your demonization of science is solely calling for the glorification of the irrational. How can that not be anything but simply reactionary? T: Granted. I do have a particular bent for the irrational and absurd . And I do seek out and revel in finding the edges of the impossible , the improbable , the unexplainable , and to some the indigestible . But, the way I see it, I am simply tooting for the underdog here. Don't you think the irrational deserves a mascot too, like science is for the rational? F: But don't you find that to be quite myopic, un-ruminated? T: Rationally, yes. Irrationally, well.... F: Now that is just aversion! T: Okay. You got me there friend. But my reverence for ...

The Meaning's Edge

The Soul of Time by Trumbull Stickney THE SOUL OF TIME  T IME'S a circumference  Whereof the segment of our station seems  A long straight line from nothing into naught.  Therefore we say " progress, " " infinity " —  Dull words whose object  Hangs in the air of error and delights  Our boyish minds ahunt for butterflies.  For aspiration studies not the sky  But looks for stars; the victories of faith  Are soldiered none the less with certainties,  And all the multitudinous armies decked  With banners blown ahead and flute before  March not to the desert or th' Elysian fields,  But in the track of some discovery,  The grip and cognizance of something true,  Which won resolves a better distribution  Between the dreaming mind and real truth.  I cannot understand you.  'T is because  You lean over my meaning's edge and feel  A dizziness of the things I have not said. ...

Materialism, Consciousness and The Totality of Truth

What is reality? Where does one anchor one's sense of what is real? In other words, what is the true nature of the phenomenon of our experience? These questions contain many loaded terms, much-debated and discussed. As such, they can quickly become philosophical dynamite, the kind that could burst into flames by the tiniest spark of a misspoken word or an ill-pondered conjecture. Nonetheless, some deem these questions worth asking, to grab hold of that philosophical dynamite, to stroll through the cloud of metaphysical splinters, to brave the tumult of the raging epistemic tempest. All in the hope of reaching some imagined calm centre of understanding, enlightenment, deliverance, redemption, yada, yada, yada . Here is one such attempt.   Things and Stuff: The fetish of materialism, as manifested today through consumer capitalism, is no stranger to anyone, anywhere, anymore. While it takes different forms in different places, the essence of the obsession is the same. On Wall St...

Reality and Fiction: Collective Hallucinations

This is a story set in my city, Dhaka, when one autumn day in the early '90s, hundreds of people gathered outside Dhaka Central Jail in protest. They were seeking to stop the hanging of a man who was apparently on death row, within the premises. However, the problem was, the man was not in the jail at all. In fact, he never existed. When I was 8 years old, Bangladesh was a country of 120 million. Dhaka was a city of 7 million. And we all had 1 television channel we could watch - Bangladesh Television. Back then, a TV was a matter of novelty. And coloured TV sets were only the luxury of a select few in Dhaka. It was a time when people across the country were crowding around the one television set in their villages. Congregations formed inside lone huts juiced up by a stolen power line, where scores of people would gather to watch the entertainment. The magic box would bring us a select range of programming - from the state-scripted nightly news, to heavily censored 80's Ame...