Skip to main content

From Monkey-dumb To God-hood



Until very recently, the term 'consciousness' was exclusively reserved to describe only the human experience of cognition and thinking. This was, of course, a result of the hegemonic scientific dialectic in our society. By its monopoly over definitions, science was determined to keep the animal kingdom away from being conscious at all. Until apparently sometime in 2012 this happened.

However, the curious thing about it was that this admittance of animal 'consciousness', occurred much more like a UN resolution, than as a scientific breakthrough. Instead of the time tested age old scientific methodologies of "truth-finding", the definitional laxity occurred in the form of the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness, which was signed into existence by a group of prominent international scientists. While the comedy of the situation was ticklish to me on its own, it also drove home a very obvious point as well - that essentially, science has very little to say about "consciousness" at all.


Yet, despite the definitional autocracy of science through the ages, it is clear to me where this bias arose within the scientific community. It comes from the very true observation that, what we call human consciousness is vastly different from the consciousness that animals possess. In most ways, human cognitive abilities are leaps and bounds beyond the cognitive abilities of even our nearest species relative, the primates. Because, cognition is specifically a mental process. And while primate mental processes can accommodate for forms of pack hunting, certain levels of emotional responses, and even some basic forms of organized warfare, it is a very long leap from there - to language, poetry, art, morality, spirituality and globe-girdling, electronically connected, information transfer-oriented, super societies, capable of releasing the energies that light the stars.

There are those who shudder at the very insinuation that human beings are "superior" (a poor descriptor) to the rest of the animal and natural kingdom. Understandably, I am sympathetic to their aversion. Because in some way, it was our recognition of our "superiority" that apparently gave us all permission for mania, to consciously participate in the destruction and pillage of the planet, of our Mother Gaia. The consequences of it are all around us. And despite whatever "leaping strides" are being made by suited up, uptight bureaucrats, in expensive climate summits around the world, their impact is a meagre pittance compared to the gravity of the ecological collapse that seems to be looming in our horizon. But, I digress.....

Coming back to our place on this earth, even though I might understand the "We are no better than animals" point of view, I cannot agree with it. Because, it admits defeat to our present circumstance, and is a dangerous waste of the gift of thought, cognition and imagination that we have been gifted. To my mind, human beings were made to emerge on the planet to be the guardians of its ecosystems and the preserver of its organic life (be it on the planet, or beyond it). The very fact that our existence is a major quantum leap from primate life, inexplicable by any scientific or rational model, and poorly handled by any theological model, indicates that we were brought forth by forces beyond our recognition, with specific intent - to be the custodians of the biota. The fact that we have made a mess of this divinely bestowed responsibility, is scant excuse to absolve us of this responsibility in totality, by simply saying, "We're no different than the monkey." That is an argument I categorically reject.

Sure, there might be partial truth to the statement. The observation that modern day football hooligans can be as dumb as a roving band of excited baboons. That the brutality of the likes of ISIS, is comparable to the animalistic impulse of mindless, aggressive, apes. And that the male-dominant, social hierarchical structures under which we have been labouring for millennia, harkens directly back to the primate tendency to form male-dominated social hierarchies as well. But, the difference is, that we recognize these dichotomies. We try to create structures to control it. We lament about our inability to overcome it. And we seek forever to transcend it. In this way, we stand as the connecting bridge between two extremes of being. That is how the human experience within history is essentially a "mad dash from monkeydom to godhood". Will we make it? That will depend on our consciousness, and what we choose to do with it during the crucial moments along the way.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Meaning's Edge

The Soul of Time by Trumbull Stickney THE SOUL OF TIME  T IME'S a circumference  Whereof the segment of our station seems  A long straight line from nothing into naught.  Therefore we say " progress, " " infinity " —  Dull words whose object  Hangs in the air of error and delights  Our boyish minds ahunt for butterflies.  For aspiration studies not the sky  But looks for stars; the victories of faith  Are soldiered none the less with certainties,  And all the multitudinous armies decked  With banners blown ahead and flute before  March not to the desert or th' Elysian fields,  But in the track of some discovery,  The grip and cognizance of something true,  Which won resolves a better distribution  Between the dreaming mind and real truth.  I cannot understand you.  'T is because  You lean over my meaning's edge and feel  A dizziness of the things I have not said. ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Conquest of Dimensions

It is obvious that there exists many definitional ambiguities with regards to the phenomenon that we call "life". Interestingly, in a world where hegemony of description is essentially the seat of power, the term has yet to be completely hijacked by the authoritative establishments under which we live today. Therefore, when I decided to Google "define life", the output was multifaceted, diverse and often vague. Nonetheless, conversation cannot be stopped short, simply for lack of exact descriptors. Among the many definitions I found, there is the scientific one (defined by the dynamism of biological processes), the pragmatic one (defined as the necessary condition to be 'alive'), the temporal one (defined as the phenomenon that occurs between birth and death), the philosophical one (defined as the existential conundrum within which we all dwell). And among the various other articulations on the net, Terence McKenna provides a definition of life that I...
Post a Comment
Read more

We are your friends

We are beautiful. Together we shine. We are loud, we are music. We are dance, dance, all night. We are permanence, like love, like hope, like time. We are ephemeral, like wisps of hash smoke, Exuding like visual poetry from your lips to mine. We rise and we fall, to the moods of the skies, To the drone of the planet, to the hum of the cosmos that never dies. We live, to live hard We choose it - living hard, over hardly living. To live, is to keep moving, We understand this truth. And we pay homage to it in our dance moves. We seek moments. Moments of laughter, boisterous and great. We take our laughter with a side of stomach ache. We seek moments of ecstasy, piercing and soulful. We feed off the lifeforce of numinous truths. We seek moments of caring, compassion and tenderness. We bask in the warmth, the buzz, the fuzziness. And we seek moments of meaning. Meaning so overwhelming, that words collapse before it. Meaning so profound, that silence is its true la...
Post a Comment
Read more

Haunting Echoes in the Night

Yesterday, my city, the place of my birth and childhood, was bathed in blood and tears. Deep wounds were inflicted, during an overnight orgy of brutality and violence, in a stunning degradation of all things sacred we have ever held dear. For 13 hours the nation watched, helpless, petrified, and terrorized. The victims: They were one of us Reports that emerged first read '20 foreigners killed in terrorist attacks in Dhaka'. Even as the standoff was diffused, the narrative remained the same - ISIS militants have specifically targeted foreigners in Gulshan area, the diplomatic zone of my city. Its reiterations had reverberated worldwide by last night, when I get a call from a friend abroad. He says 'I am sorry to hear it man. A tragedy. Although it is not a direct tragedy for Bangladesh, really.' Really? Did it really make a difference? I told him how confused we were all feeling about what had just happened. Does it have to matter that apparently no Bangladeshi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Materialism, Consciousness and The Totality of Truth

What is reality? Where does one anchor one's sense of what is real? In other words, what is the true nature of the phenomenon of our experience? These questions contain many loaded terms, much-debated and discussed. As such, they can quickly become philosophical dynamite, the kind that could burst into flames by the tiniest spark of a misspoken word or an ill-pondered conjecture. Nonetheless, some deem these questions worth asking, to grab hold of that philosophical dynamite, to stroll through the cloud of metaphysical splinters, to brave the tumult of the raging epistemic tempest. All in the hope of reaching some imagined calm centre of understanding, enlightenment, deliverance, redemption, yada, yada, yada . Here is one such attempt.   Things and Stuff: The fetish of materialism, as manifested today through consumer capitalism, is no stranger to anyone, anywhere, anymore. While it takes different forms in different places, the essence of the obsession is the same. On Wall St...
Post a Comment
Read more