Skip to main content

From Monkey-dumb To God-hood



Until very recently, the term 'consciousness' was exclusively reserved to describe only the human experience of cognition and thinking. This was, of course, a result of the hegemonic scientific dialectic in our society. By its monopoly over definitions, science was determined to keep the animal kingdom away from being conscious at all. Until apparently sometime in 2012 this happened.

However, the curious thing about it was that this admittance of animal 'consciousness', occurred much more like a UN resolution, than as a scientific breakthrough. Instead of the time tested age old scientific methodologies of "truth-finding", the definitional laxity occurred in the form of the Cambridge Declaration on Consciousness, which was signed into existence by a group of prominent international scientists. While the comedy of the situation was ticklish to me on its own, it also drove home a very obvious point as well - that essentially, science has very little to say about "consciousness" at all.


Yet, despite the definitional autocracy of science through the ages, it is clear to me where this bias arose within the scientific community. It comes from the very true observation that, what we call human consciousness is vastly different from the consciousness that animals possess. In most ways, human cognitive abilities are leaps and bounds beyond the cognitive abilities of even our nearest species relative, the primates. Because, cognition is specifically a mental process. And while primate mental processes can accommodate for forms of pack hunting, certain levels of emotional responses, and even some basic forms of organized warfare, it is a very long leap from there - to language, poetry, art, morality, spirituality and globe-girdling, electronically connected, information transfer-oriented, super societies, capable of releasing the energies that light the stars.

There are those who shudder at the very insinuation that human beings are "superior" (a poor descriptor) to the rest of the animal and natural kingdom. Understandably, I am sympathetic to their aversion. Because in some way, it was our recognition of our "superiority" that apparently gave us all permission for mania, to consciously participate in the destruction and pillage of the planet, of our Mother Gaia. The consequences of it are all around us. And despite whatever "leaping strides" are being made by suited up, uptight bureaucrats, in expensive climate summits around the world, their impact is a meagre pittance compared to the gravity of the ecological collapse that seems to be looming in our horizon. But, I digress.....

Coming back to our place on this earth, even though I might understand the "We are no better than animals" point of view, I cannot agree with it. Because, it admits defeat to our present circumstance, and is a dangerous waste of the gift of thought, cognition and imagination that we have been gifted. To my mind, human beings were made to emerge on the planet to be the guardians of its ecosystems and the preserver of its organic life (be it on the planet, or beyond it). The very fact that our existence is a major quantum leap from primate life, inexplicable by any scientific or rational model, and poorly handled by any theological model, indicates that we were brought forth by forces beyond our recognition, with specific intent - to be the custodians of the biota. The fact that we have made a mess of this divinely bestowed responsibility, is scant excuse to absolve us of this responsibility in totality, by simply saying, "We're no different than the monkey." That is an argument I categorically reject.

Sure, there might be partial truth to the statement. The observation that modern day football hooligans can be as dumb as a roving band of excited baboons. That the brutality of the likes of ISIS, is comparable to the animalistic impulse of mindless, aggressive, apes. And that the male-dominant, social hierarchical structures under which we have been labouring for millennia, harkens directly back to the primate tendency to form male-dominated social hierarchies as well. But, the difference is, that we recognize these dichotomies. We try to create structures to control it. We lament about our inability to overcome it. And we seek forever to transcend it. In this way, we stand as the connecting bridge between two extremes of being. That is how the human experience within history is essentially a "mad dash from monkeydom to godhood". Will we make it? That will depend on our consciousness, and what we choose to do with it during the crucial moments along the way.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reality and Fiction: Collective Hallucinations

This is a story set in my city, Dhaka, when one autumn day in the early '90s, hundreds of people gathered outside Dhaka Central Jail in protest. They were seeking to stop the hanging of a man who was apparently on death row, within the premises. However, the problem was, the man was not in the jail at all. In fact, he never existed. When I was 8 years old, Bangladesh was a country of 120 million. Dhaka was a city of 7 million. And we all had 1 television channel we could watch - Bangladesh Television. Back then, a TV was a matter of novelty. And coloured TV sets were only the luxury of a select few in Dhaka. It was a time when people across the country were crowding around the one television set in their villages. Congregations formed inside lone huts juiced up by a stolen power line, where scores of people would gather to watch the entertainment. The magic box would bring us a select range of programming - from the state-scripted nightly news, to heavily censored 80's Ame...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is Humanity Worth Saving?

There is a song by a Bengali folk singer Dwij Bhushan, in which he revels about being alive and the great fortune he had of being born in a human form. In the song, called " Hridmajhare Rakhibo ",  Dwij Bhushan is grateful to life and feels blessed to have the chance to enjoy the beauty and brilliance of this world. Some of the words (roughly translated by yours truly) are as follows: If we let go of the divine touch  Of life that is within us, We will never get it back again. So, I will keep this life close to my heart, I will never let it go. The sentiments are indeed heartwarming. Every time I sing this song, I can feel the beauty that he speaks of, often leading me to verge of tears. However, in the face of endless war, poverty, disease and ecological crises in this world, I can imagine how this sentiment can feel quite hollow. Not to mention, given the fact that humanity is the source of so much malaise on this planet, one is naturally led to wonder whethe...
Post a Comment
Read more

We are your friends

We are beautiful. Together we shine. We are loud, we are music. We are dance, dance, all night. We are permanence, like love, like hope, like time. We are ephemeral, like wisps of hash smoke, Exuding like visual poetry from your lips to mine. We rise and we fall, to the moods of the skies, To the drone of the planet, to the hum of the cosmos that never dies. We live, to live hard We choose it - living hard, over hardly living. To live, is to keep moving, We understand this truth. And we pay homage to it in our dance moves. We seek moments. Moments of laughter, boisterous and great. We take our laughter with a side of stomach ache. We seek moments of ecstasy, piercing and soulful. We feed off the lifeforce of numinous truths. We seek moments of caring, compassion and tenderness. We bask in the warmth, the buzz, the fuzziness. And we seek moments of meaning. Meaning so overwhelming, that words collapse before it. Meaning so profound, that silence is its true la...
Post a Comment
Read more

Conspiracy Theories: Epistemological Mutants

What is a conspiracy theory? Political Psychologists define it as "attempts to explain the ultimate causes of significant social and political events and circumstances with claims of secret plots by two or more powerful actors". There are a few important elements that form part of this definition. Firstly, conspiracy theories seek to provide an explanation for political and social events. Secondly, they rest on the belief that shadowy powerful actors are executing secret plots to manipulate socio-political dynamics. Thirdly, they are generally based on a number of deductive errors in reasoning on the part of their proponents, whereby singular events or data points, that have no rational causal relationship, are linked together to form a narrative. In essence, conspiracy theories are based on connecting information nodes (which may or may not have an observable correlation, i.e. tendency to occur together) without any empirical evidence that proves a causal relationship betwee...
Post a Comment
Read more

Shijya-Moni

Shijya and Moni were brothers, twins conceived at the same time, sharing the same womb, connected by the same life-force. Their destinies had been entwined from the moment of their birth. Yet, despite the congruence of their cosmic karma, the lives of Shijya and Moni unfolded in perfectly divergent paths, in diametrically opposite tangents. So much so that it made their kinship almost unrecognizable to those who knew them.  Shijya was the ideal child, a paragon of virtue, and the embodiment of studiousness, diligence and integrity. He excelled at everything he did. A favourite among his teachers, and a darling to his aunts and uncles, he was known to be humble, polite, kind, and helpful. He had no enemies and many friends, all of whom saw him as a reliable confidant they could turn to at any time. By the time he was 16, Shijya had all academic avenues open to him to explore any field of study he wanted, winning scholarships and Ivy League admissions. He was also frequently seen spe...
Post a Comment
Read more