Skip to main content

Interrupting the Holy Fight

It was one of those conversations had in tipsy stupors, when the topic of religion materialized in our midst. The thread that led to this theme included multiple steps - beginning with the sorry state of our world today, quickly transforming into global geopolitical dynamics, to the polarities of East vs. West. Hanging out with social scientists can lead one into such snaking trialogues, which more often than not were cyclical. And too often they ended with somebody raising their arms in despair and yelling "Fuck it! It's all going to hell!"

"Western religions are not worth busting your heads over!" said my friend, almost on the edge of one of those cries of despair. Terence and I were being thoroughly entertained by (and partaking in) Baba's periodic outbursts for a couple of hours now. "These religions are suffering from such a crisis of spirit. There is nothing left in them. Christians are no longer christians -their new religion is money!"

We had been talking about the global balance of power, and our friend insisted on viewing our current state of affairs as a stalemate between East and West. "And so you mean to say that Eastern religions do not have this problem?" I inquired with care, keenly aware of the delicate terrains we had just entered.

"Of course! Eastern religions like Islam are thriving. There is no paucity of belief in majority of the Muslim world. The spirit still flourishes." His eyes were gleaming now, wide open and piercing mine. I could tell he was feeling that rush of surety; the confidence in the presence of supposed veracity; the glee in the possession of what one thinks to be a solid argument. "I mean, look at ISIS! Not to condone their maniacal brutality, but the very fact that they exist goes to prove my point. There is still a lot to get gung-ho about in Eastern religions."



I looked at Terence, who looked quite perplexed. Something about Baba's articulation of his perspective did not sit quite right with me (nor Terence either). My disagreement had nothing to do with the surface of the point being made, i.e. the relative crisis of spirit between Christianity and Islam. Instead, my mind focused on something else completely. And I was about to attack his argument at its roots, instead of the boughs.

"So, you think Islam is an Eastern religion?" I asked, mimicking sincere curiosity. (Mimic, because I already knew what he thought)

"What do you mean? Of course it is! Christianity is a Western religion and Islam is Eastern. That is completely obvious." he replied. It was apparent that his geopolitical worldview had made perfect rationalizations in his mind that the other boundaries were also drawn of same chalk, along same lines. "You don't agree?" he asked.

I did not. To my mind, if I were to be given only two descriptors (East and West), I would put Christianity and Islam within the same bucket (West), while placing Buddhism and Hinduism in the other (East). This distinction is only loosely related to the geographical reference. But in my understanding, the more important distinction was not about place, but about point of view.

"The way I see it" started Terence, "the difference between Western and Eastern religion is one of perspective, and about how distinctly they view time. Western religions, incubated within Western cultures of philosophical materialism and the rise of rationality (that ultimately also led to modern science), views time as synonymous to history. Both Christianity and Islam, begin their mythos at specific defined points in time, with the fall from Paradise of the first humans. I mean, it is quite literally countable. Therefore, these religions, are cemented and confined within the historical narrative of the last few thousand years.

While on the other hand, Eastern religion is basically timeless. And when time is invoked, it is either in the Hindu system of chiliocosms of eternity, just cycles upon cycles and aeons upon aeons. Or it's the time of Taoism which is the time of the moment and the insight. That way, Eastern traditions and religions have had a more fluid interpretation of time and reality as a whole. For example, while reincarnations are a common belief in the East, the West has only had appetite for it once in its entire existence - the resurrection of Jesus - and it is quite insistently described as a 'miracle'. Islam, in that sense, is as much a Western religion as Christianity."

Baba looked amused at first, almost impressed. But upon fully processing the meaning of what had just happened, he twisted his face in a frustrated frown, and protested loudly, "Why do you have to philosophize the the fun out of a good fight man!? Let the battle lines be there, as boundaries of truth and lies to be fought over. What's the point of taking it that away?"

And he was right. There was no point. It was only amusement. Plus, we should have known better. Our dear friend Baba was here for the show. He liked to have the best seat to watch the end of the world, the way history was obviously conspiring for it to transpire.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Dream About Death

Last night, I had a dream, in which death was not what it seems. I saw a world in which the deceased, instead of diminishing completely at death, appeared to remain in some form within this reality plane. They could be seen, as they had been until the moment of death itself. They could be spoken to and heard, even touched and held, as if they had never left. Yet, this state of post-death non-being, this abstracted state of in-between, lasted only some time, maybe a few days or a week at most. After which, the deceased slowly faded away, not to be seen, heard or touched again.  I received no indication, in my dream, as to the exact nature of what this phenomenon means. Was it that the deceased actually remained on earth, even in a physical form, for just a little longer? Or was it more likely that it was an edifice of their former being, created out of their memories that dwelled in the collective minds of those who knew them? Were these memories somehow ossified into existence, as ...

The Meaning's Edge

The Soul of Time by Trumbull Stickney THE SOUL OF TIME  T IME'S a circumference  Whereof the segment of our station seems  A long straight line from nothing into naught.  Therefore we say " progress, " " infinity " —  Dull words whose object  Hangs in the air of error and delights  Our boyish minds ahunt for butterflies.  For aspiration studies not the sky  But looks for stars; the victories of faith  Are soldiered none the less with certainties,  And all the multitudinous armies decked  With banners blown ahead and flute before  March not to the desert or th' Elysian fields,  But in the track of some discovery,  The grip and cognizance of something true,  Which won resolves a better distribution  Between the dreaming mind and real truth.  I cannot understand you.  'T is because  You lean over my meaning's edge and feel  A dizziness of the things I have not said. ...

Materialism, Consciousness and The Totality of Truth

What is reality? Where does one anchor one's sense of what is real? In other words, what is the true nature of the phenomenon of our experience? These questions contain many loaded terms, much-debated and discussed. As such, they can quickly become philosophical dynamite, the kind that could burst into flames by the tiniest spark of a misspoken word or an ill-pondered conjecture. Nonetheless, some deem these questions worth asking, to grab hold of that philosophical dynamite, to stroll through the cloud of metaphysical splinters, to brave the tumult of the raging epistemic tempest. All in the hope of reaching some imagined calm centre of understanding, enlightenment, deliverance, redemption, yada, yada, yada . Here is one such attempt.   Things and Stuff: The fetish of materialism, as manifested today through consumer capitalism, is no stranger to anyone, anywhere, anymore. While it takes different forms in different places, the essence of the obsession is the same. On Wall St...

Shijya-Moni

Shijya and Moni were brothers, twins conceived at the same time, sharing the same womb, connected by the same life-force. Their destinies had been entwined from the moment of their birth. Yet, despite the congruence of their cosmic karma, the lives of Shijya and Moni unfolded in perfectly divergent paths, in diametrically opposite tangents. So much so that it made their kinship almost unrecognizable to those who knew them.  Shijya was the ideal child, a paragon of virtue, and the embodiment of studiousness, diligence and integrity. He excelled at everything he did. A favourite among his teachers, and a darling to his aunts and uncles, he was known to be humble, polite, kind, and helpful. He had no enemies and many friends, all of whom saw him as a reliable confidant they could turn to at any time. By the time he was 16, Shijya had all academic avenues open to him to explore any field of study he wanted, winning scholarships and Ivy League admissions. He was also frequently seen spe...

The Conquest of Dimensions

It is obvious that there exists many definitional ambiguities with regards to the phenomenon that we call "life". Interestingly, in a world where hegemony of description is essentially the seat of power, the term has yet to be completely hijacked by the authoritative establishments under which we live today. Therefore, when I decided to Google "define life", the output was multifaceted, diverse and often vague. Nonetheless, conversation cannot be stopped short, simply for lack of exact descriptors. Among the many definitions I found, there is the scientific one (defined by the dynamism of biological processes), the pragmatic one (defined as the necessary condition to be 'alive'), the temporal one (defined as the phenomenon that occurs between birth and death), the philosophical one (defined as the existential conundrum within which we all dwell). And among the various other articulations on the net, Terence McKenna provides a definition of life that I...